The fact that Petrified Forest National Monument was created
in 1906 and converted to Petrified Forest National Park in 1962 is ample
evidence that the resources there to protect have long been considered a
national treasure. But it’s a newer
resource – one not built until after national park status was achieved – that is
the latest to hold that title.
The Painted Desert Community Complex was one of five
projects during the Mission 66 nationwide re-building program for which the
National Park Service commissioned designs by noted American architects of the
time. Of the five projects (the other
four were in Dinosaur National Monument, Wright Brothers National Memorial,
Gettysburg National Historical Park, and Rocky Mountain National Park) only
three remain. The Cyclorama at
Gettysburg was demolished in 2013 due to its location in an area now considered
inappropriate and the Quarry Visitor Center at Dinosaur developed structural
problems and was also demolished in recent years. The firm of Richard Neutra and Robert
Alexander designed both the Petrified Forest and Gettysburg projects. Richard Neutra was a well-known modernist
architect, working mostly in southern California. He had worked for Frank Lloyd Wright early in
his career and had made his name through his use of glass, steel, and concrete
or masonry in rectilinear and unadorned shapes.
The selection of Neutra to design projects for the National Park
Service, which was only 15 years or so removed from the end of the CCC era and
its rustic style, was exceptionally bold.
The Painted Desert Community Complex was the only project of
these, and maybe the only one during the Mission 66 program, that included
facilities for all aspects of park operation.
It is a small planned community that included public facilities in the
visitor center with adjacent concession services around a central plaza as well
as maintenance shops, employee housing, a school, and community center. The project even included the park entrance station. Very few, if any, other projects in the NPS
encompass this scope. Neutra and
Alexander’s design used building massing and the austerity of their design
ethic to brilliantly separate incompatible uses in such a way that each use can
function well and independently of the others, all in a relatively small
space. It is the genius of this
arrangement of spaces when added to the architect’s prominence, the importance
of the Mission 66 program as a whole, and the importance of the Painted Desert
Community Complex as a highlight of that program that has led the Complex to
achieve a greater recognition in recent years as a collection of buildings and
landscapes worthy of protection.
The architects visited the site of the project in May of
1958. I surmise that the wind was
blowing hard that spring day because the main environmental feature of the
complex, appropriately, is protection from wind. The entire Complex is oriented to turn its
back on the southwest, the direction much of the wind comes from at this
site. The architects drafted an explanation
of their housing designs they called “Homes for National Park Service Families
on a Wind-Swept Desert”.
Built in the early 1960’s, the Complex began having
structural problems right away due to both soil problems and poor construction
practices. The first post-construction
structural analysis was completed in 1965 – several others followed. The most recent one is from 2009. The structural problems were not adequately
addressed and kept getting worse. The
roofs of many modernist buildings, including these, were designed to be
perfectly flat and failed, predictably, giving all flat roofs a bad name in the
process. When energy prices went up, the
large expanses of glass became more expensive to keep. As vehicles got bigger, the entrance station
and the gas station canopy were not tall enough to accommodate them. By 1993, when the park updated its master
planning in a new General Management Plan, the Complex had been a failure that
was considered too expensive in maintenance costs to retain. The park proposed to demolish the Complex and
rebuild something new and larger in its place.
By 2004, whether due to economic realities or a reassessment
of the Complex, thinking had changed and a revision of the General Management
Plan included the decision to retain and rehabilitate the Painted Desert
Community Complex. In 2005, the Painted
Desert Community Complex Historic District was created, listed on the National
Register of Historic Places. In 2006, a
thorough Historic Structure Report and Cultural Landscape Report were completed
and have been used as a guide for the modest rehabilitation work that has been
done since.
This year, Petrified Forest has entered into a partnership
with the National Trust for Historic Preservation on the sustainable rehabilitation
of the Painted Desert Community Complex.
The Trust has designated the Complex one of its NationalTreasures and will work with the National Park Service by raising the
profile of the Complex, providing expertise, planning, and perhaps some
fundraising toward its sustainable rehabilitation. When the National Treasure web page was
uploaded, there was a companion blogpost also uploaded by modernist advocate Chris Madrid French in the
Preservation Leadership Forum.
As the Treasure page says, the major threat to the Complex
is the lack of funding for its rehabilitation.
We have successfully competed for occasional NPS capital funds to
stabilize the foundations of three buildings (Community Building in 2009,
Visitor Center in 2014, and Block A housing units in 2015) and to replace
heating and cooling systems in the Visitor Center (2010 and 2012,
respectively). We used our cyclic
maintenance allocation to replace obsolete windows in the administrative
offices this year, and we have used operating funds to restore the Visitor
Center balcony and planter and the main façade of the School. Despite those inroads, millions of dollars
are still needed to address all the needs at the Complex. The NPS Centennial may provide the next
opportunity to continue raising the profile of this Complex, get additional
partners excited about its sustainable rehabilitation, and get some of the
high-profile work done that NPS funding sources are not likely to reach. These projects include restoring the glass
storefront to the restaurant and gift shop, restoring flat roofs to the Visitor
Center and Painted Desert Oasis (concession building), restoring at least a
portion of the gas station canopy, re-exposing the terrace off the southeast
side of the Visitor Center building, and returning the restaurant to its
original diner design.
It’s
also true that there is inadequate fire protection, the plumbing and electrical
systems are over 50 years old, and many other components need attention if the
Complex is to serve as park headquarters for another 50 years. The less public buildings like housing and
maintenance shops will be harder to get a partner’s help with. We will keep our shoulder to the wheel and
try to make quality improvements that recognize and appreciate the Painted
Desert Community Complex’s unique place in the history of the park and the
country as another of the National Treasures under our care.
 |
Painted Desert Visitor Center Front |
 |
Fred Harvey Company 1963 |
 |
Fred Harvey Company: Xanterra 2013 |
 |
Painted Desert Visitor Center Balcony 1963 |
 |
Painted Desert Visitor Center Balcony 2007 |
 |
Painted Desert Visitor Center Balcony 2012 |
 |
Painted Desert Diner 1963 |
 |
Painted Desert Diner 2013 |